Recent Posts

Web Polls by Vizu

Recent Comments

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

« May 2007 | Main | August 2007 »

June 12, 2007

I Don't Heart Huckabee

Mike Huckabee might once have been the Governor of Arkansas, and he might be a candidate for the Republican nomination for the Presidency, but he is also a nutjob - like at least three of his competitors. And if you thought George Bush was a religious zealot, just wait until you get one of these guys into the White House.

Last week, the Republican hopefuls staged a debate in New Hampshire during which they were asked for their views on evolution. Mike Huckabee: "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth. A person either believes that God created the process or believes that it was an accident and that it just happened all on its own. If anybody wants to believe that they are the descendants of a primate, they are certainly welcome to do it." Ok, so Huckabee isn't a serious candidate.

But John McCain is.

"I admire [Huckabee's] description, because I hold that view," said McCain. (Earlier he did not raise his hand when asked if he thought that evolution was untrue. Sam Brownback, and, naturally, Tom Tancredo, did.) So that's four out of the ten runners who disbelieve a simple scientific fact.

Now this post isn't a debate on creationism. It's patent nonsense, a triumph of pure belief over empiric fact. And if you disagree with me, I have no time to persuade you otherwise. The fact is that the Republicans have a choice: a white, Christian man over 50, or a white, Christian man over 50 who thinks that God created the earth in six days around six thousand years ago. (For all I know they also think the world is flat, and that when you kiss a frog it turns into a Prince.)

They may be a joke - but if Hillary Clinton gets the Democratic nomination, one of these guys is going to be President. And it could be McCain - the political outcast and rebel who's suddenly become Bush's Iraq lapdog, and now a champion of the worst element of anti-intellectual America.

And we thought Bush's ignorant views on stem cells were obsolete and driven by religious fervor.

June 06, 2007

God Help The Atheist Politician

There was a time, not so long ago, when the USA pondered the idea of a Catholic in the White House. Would Kennedy take his orders from Rome? That was the question on the lips of the populace. He won, and he didn’t.

Now 95% of Americans say they’d vote for an ‘appropriately qualified’ candidate of the Catholic persuasion. And 92% say they’d vote in a Jew. 72% of the population, according to Gallup’s poll, would even vote a Mormon into the White House – and Mormons have some pretty weird ideas, not just about underwear. (Did you know, for example, that the word ‘Mormon’ has been trademarked by a front company for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints?)

Religious tolerance has obviously come a long way.

In fact, a majority of Americans would support almost ANY candidate from any background. Hispanic? Sure, 87% in favor! A woman? Absolutely, 88% in favor. Three times divorced? Come on in! 67% in favor! A homosexual? Well… ok, we guess: 55% in favor!

How about an atheist?

No. You see, irreligious intolerance is increasing.

Gallup says that 53% of Americans would not vote for a qualified candidate for the White House who was an atheist. According to Newsweek figures in 2006, only 37% would vote for an atheist – down from 49% in 1999.

We have religious folks by the dozen in the Congress… Roman Catholic (28.8%), Baptist (14.1%), Methodist (11.4%) Presbyterian (9.7%), Episcopalian (7.9%) and Jewish (6.9%). We’ve got Mormons, Lutherans… we have a Sikh… two Buddhists… a Muslim… and we even have a freakin’ Scientologist, for crying out loud. (Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida.)

But there is only one self-identified atheist in the entire Legislative branch of our government, Rep. Pete Stark of CA. That’s one atheist, out of 535 legislative members. (Obviously there are none in the highest echelons of the Executive branch – Mr. Bush, who has been quoted by Mahmoud Abbas as saying that God told him to go to war in Iraq, would hardly condone that.)

Atheists, therefore, make up approximate 0.2% of our bicameral legislature, and approximately 0% of the highest levels of our executive branch. The Supreme Court, with five Catholics, two Jews, an Episcopalian and a Protestant, has zero representation for the atheist population.

Now, many of you people of faith out there will think this is perfectly reasonable and acceptable. After all, the majority of the population is in some manner theistic.

But atheists are, in fact, the most under-represented minority in modern American history.

Look at the stats: 7% of the adult population does not believe in God or any kind of universal spirit, (Gallup) and the US Census (quoted in Wiki here) claims that 15% of Americans are either atheist or agnostic. That’s 29.4 million people.

But every one of the Republican and Democratic contenders for the White House is, naturally, religious – and their piety is evidently increasing daily, as exemplified by Hillary Clinton’s revelation (pun intended) that only her ‘faith’ got her through her marriage difficulties, and the almost daily proclamations of religious fervor by every major candidate.

We are presented every election with a choice: the religious candidate, or the religious candidate. At the Federal level, there is one atheist to represent the views of my 15 million fellow non-believers. There are virtually no atheists at the state level, either – no great surprise, since Arkansas, Massachusetts, Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas all include language in their constitutions proclaiming that an official may be "excluded from holding office" if she/he does not "acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being”.

We are 15 million people without representation, without a legislative, judicial or policy-shaping voice.

And this is more than an ‘issue’ like gun control, gay marriage, the environment or abortion. Each of those issues has its advocates, its opponents, its successes and its failures.

No, this is a fundamental worldview. And there is nobody out there representing it. The entire triumvirate of legislature, executive and judiciary is – with the exception of one man – utterly at odds with my personal understanding of the universe, and is out of step with 15 million of my compatriots.

Were this any other group, the country would be in uproar. No blacks in the executive branch?? Get some in there, quick! No women in the Supreme Court? Get on that, right away!! No atheists in the legislature? Bleh… whatever.

So I for one will find myself constantly cringing during this long, long election campaign as candidate after candidate tries to outdo his or her fellows by wearing their religion ever-more prominently on their sleeve. I will shudder at their proclamations of guidance from their invisible friend (my five-year old has one, but she’ll outgrow hers). I will grit my teeth as the candidates who seem to have some kind of moral or ethical relevance attribute it not to their own integrity, but to some spirit or series of fables whose instructions they are to follow.

Watch out, America. We fifteen million may be meek now. But you know what the Bible says about the meek.

June 05, 2007

Education: Kryptonite To Republicans?

The dumber we are, the more likely we are to vote Republican. That’s a fact. Indisputable and irrefutable. Ok, Im being deliberately provocative and I fully recognize that the country has many, many smart Republicans. But the figures don’t lie - voters in blue states (2004 Presidential election) are on the whole smarter than voters in red states. So I pose the question at the end of this analysis: why?

The following chart is derived from the 2004 Census Report On Educational Attainment. The full report, from which I stripped this data, is here. I added to that report the way the state voted in the Presidential election of 2004, and I then calculated the number of people per state with the level of education specified. (This information came from the 2004 Census - I divided the over-25 population in each state by the percentage of graduates to come up with the numbers.)

I then tallied the numbers of people with the specified level of education and divided by the total red or blue population to derive an overall percentage of people with either a college or high school education across the country, broken down by party.

The result, as you will see below, is very telling. In states that voted for Kerry, the average percentage of college graduates is 30.177%. In states that voted for Bush, the average percentage of college graduates is 24.932%. If we assume that a college education is an indicator of intelligence, we can then hypothesize that the average voter in a blue state is 21% smarter than the average voter in a red state. (24.932 x 121% = 30.168).

Ok, that's silly. I retract. The disparity between Republican states and Democratic ones is smaller when one analyzes the High School results. Red states had an average of 83.145% High School graduates, compared to the blue states’ 85.903% average graduate rate. It is interesting also to note that red states occupy the bottom 10 places in the state ranking, and only 2 of the top 10. (Colorado, of course, bucked the national trend by voting for Democratic control of both its House and Senate, while still inexplicably voting for Bush - and Colorado has by far the largest percentage of graduates, at 45.7%, some 9% ahead of Hawaii at #2.)

Seriously for a moment, do you think that this does, to some extent, explain why education suffers major cuts under Republican administrations? Are the Republicans afraid of a more educated populace? Again, my question is WHY is this dichotomy so clear... my conclusions will not be yours, and quite rightly so - it's intelligent debate on this subject that interests me.

RED STATES: Total Number Over 25 – 97,180,000 Total Number H/S Grads – 80,801,000 Total Percentage H/S Grads – 83.145% Total Number College Grads – 24,229,000 Total Percentage College Grads – 24.932% BLUE STATES Total Number Over 25 – 91,201,000 Total Number H/S Grads – 78,345,000 Total Percentage H/S Grads – 85.903% Total Number College Grads – 27,522,000 Total Percentage College Grads – 30.177%

A Note On Comments

  • Please note that you do NOT have to share your email address (even though there is a field for it) if you wish to comment on this blog. If you DO share your address, it will be visible to others if they mouseover your name.

Ads By Google